King Duncan;
In Macbeth King Duncan is portrayed as a loyal and honorable leader. Early in the play, King Duncan is talking with Banquo about Macbeth and how he deserves everything that is being given to him."Welcome Hither:/ L have begun to plant thee, and will labour/ To make thee full of growing. Nobel Banquo,/ That hast no less deserved, nor must be known/ No less to have don so: let me infold thee:/ And hold thee to my heart"(1.4.27-37). In this section of the play he also points out to Banquo that he is a very honorable man, and deserves greatness too. Duncan also has a side of him that is really focused on battle. In Act I when he first hears about Macbeth and Banquo and how they won the battle, he was very proud. He gained a large amount of respect for them because they were viscous on the battle field. That side of King Duncan is greatly portratyed in Act I Scene 2. "Duncan: Dismayed not this/ Our captains, Macbeth and Banquo?/ Sergent: Yes;/ As sparrows, eagles, or the hare, the lion:/ If I say sooth, I must report they were/ As cannons overcharged with double cracks,/ So they double redoubled strokes upon the foe:/ Except they meant to bathe in reeking wounds,/ Or memorize another Golgotha,/ I cannot tell/ But I am faint, my gashes cry for help" (1.2.33-42).
Machiavelli & King Duncan;
In my opinion I don't think that Niccolo Machiavelli would approve of King Duncan's ethics, and the way he went about doing things. Also, King Duncan didn't follow one of Machiavellis largest rules. "Before all else, be armed." King Duncan allowed himself to be murdered by Macbeth because he did not have sufficient guard. He allowed him self to get drunk, and also allowed his guards to let down their guard by also getting drunk. Then it was easy for Macbeth to slip right past them, kill King Duncan using their daggers, then it was easy for Macbeth and Lady Macbeth to smear the blood over their faces. "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." This quote reminds me of how King Duncan quickly turned on the Original Thane of Cawdor, he didn't give him a chance to explain, didn't give him a second chance. He didn't really even have proof that the audience knows of, nor does that audience know what the Thane does. All we know is that King Duncan decides to have him executed because he was not loyal to him. He makes a very hasty decision, and this shows he didn't really think things through, or give chances to his Thanes. All in all, I do not believe that King Duncan followed Machiavelli's rules for a good leader.
Machiavelli & King Duncan;
In my opinion I don't think that Niccolo Machiavelli would approve of King Duncan's ethics, and the way he went about doing things. Also, King Duncan didn't follow one of Machiavellis largest rules. "Before all else, be armed." King Duncan allowed himself to be murdered by Macbeth because he did not have sufficient guard. He allowed him self to get drunk, and also allowed his guards to let down their guard by also getting drunk. Then it was easy for Macbeth to slip right past them, kill King Duncan using their daggers, then it was easy for Macbeth and Lady Macbeth to smear the blood over their faces. "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." This quote reminds me of how King Duncan quickly turned on the Original Thane of Cawdor, he didn't give him a chance to explain, didn't give him a second chance. He didn't really even have proof that the audience knows of, nor does that audience know what the Thane does. All we know is that King Duncan decides to have him executed because he was not loyal to him. He makes a very hasty decision, and this shows he didn't really think things through, or give chances to his Thanes. All in all, I do not believe that King Duncan followed Machiavelli's rules for a good leader.